A Cube of Opposition for Predicate Logic (2020), p. 110
by Nilsson, Jørgen Fischer

Copyright according to our policy

Caption

The cube as a tesseract

Logic

Aristotelian family

Buridan Sigma-4

Boolean complexity

6

Number of labels per vertex (at most)

1

Uniqueness of the vertices up to logical equivalence

No

Errors in the diagram

No

Geometry

Shape

Three Dimensional Shape (irregular)

Colinearity range

0

Coplanarity range

0

Cospatiality range

8

Representation of contradiction

By some other geometric feature

Vertex description

Conceptual info

No

Mnemonic support (AEIO, purpurea ...)

No

Form

none

Label type

symbolic

Symbolic field

logic

Contains partial formulas or symbols

Yes

Logical system

predicate logic

Edge description

Style

Diagram is colored

Yes

Diagram is embellished

No

Tags

composed operator duality

Additional notes

Let $C,D$ be unary predicates and $R$ a binary relation.

$\forall\forall$ stands for $\forall x( Cx \to \forall y (Dy \to Rxy)$
$\forall\exists$ stands for $\forall x( Cx \to \exists y (Dy \wedge Rxy)$
$\exists\forall$ stands for $\exists x( Cx \wedge \forall y (Dy \to Rxy)$
$\exists\exists$ stands for $\exists x( Cx \wedge \exists y (Dy \wedge Rxy)$

$\forall\forall\neg$ stands for $\forall x( Cx \to \forall y (Dy \to \neg Rxy)$
$\neg\exists\exists$ stands for $\neg\exists x( Cx \wedge \exists y (Dy \wedge Rxy)$

$\forall\exists\neg$ stands for $\forall x( Cx \to \exists y (Dy \wedge \neg Rxy)$
$\neg\exists\forall$ stands for $\neg\exists x( Cx \wedge \forall y (Dy \to Rxy)$

$\exists\forall\neg$ stands for $\exists x( Cx \wedge \forall y (Dy \to\neg Rxy)$
$\neg\forall\exists$ stands for $\neg\forall x( Cx \to \exists y (Dy \wedge Rxy)$

$\exists\exists\neg$ stands for $\exists x( Cx \wedge \exists y (Dy \wedge\neg Rxy)$
$\neg\forall\forall$ stands for $\neg\forall x( Cx \to \forall y (Dy \to Rxy)$

(Cf. pp. 104-105.)